Skip to main content

​
About the score

No. A score is a signal, not a verdict. A high read means the behavior looks strong, and a low read means it does not, but neither is a promise. Always do your own research before committing funds. TrustGate points you at what is worth weighing, it does not make the call for you.
No. There is no graph and no propagation. TrustGate reads behavior directly from onchain activity. Counterparties are counted as part of an address’s own behavior, never inherited into its score. Graph-based reputation is a different approach to a different problem, and it is not how TrustGate works.
Because TrustGate is adversarial infrastructure, and the people trying to beat it read docs too. If the precise weights and cutoffs were public, they would turn from a trust signal into a checklist to game. So the categories and what they mean are open, the quantitative internals are not. This is the same posture mature anti-abuse systems take.
Only public onchain activity. No off-chain data, no personal data, no KYC, no manual review. There is nothing to hand over and nothing private being read. TrustGate looks at what addresses have already done on a public ledger, which is the same data anyone can see.
It is built to be hard to game. A read weighs several kinds of behavior together, so moving one dimension does not move the result much, and the patterns that lift a score are expensive to fake at scale. No system is perfect, which is exactly why the score is a signal to weigh rather than a final verdict.
Because it has not earned anything yet, not because it did anything wrong. BLOCKED covers both “active red flags” and “no track record to stand on.” Pair the tier with the confidence level to tell those two apart, and the tier climbs as real behavior builds up.
A tier reserved for tokens whose issuer is confirmed, like an official stablecoin. It answers “is this the real, authentic asset” rather than “how does it behave,” so it sits outside the behavioral ladder and short-circuits the usual read.

​
Using and integrating it

Arc (EVM) and Sui today, both on testnet. The scoring core is identical across them. What differs is the delivery and the gate, since each chain has its own shape. See the Networks pages.
Integration is free during testnet. Drop in the badge or consume the score at no cost while everything runs on testnet.
No. Every surface is non-invasive. You consume a signal and keep full control of your UI and your rules. Even in discovery, badging and flagging are the default and reordering is opt-in, you call it yourself or your feed never changes.
They are two lanes of the same engine. The wallet lane asks whether an address has earned trust through its history. The token lane asks whether a token is what it appears to be and whether the activity around it is honest. Same tiers and flags, different subject.
Pick by how much you want to build. The badge is one script tag. Consuming the score gives you raw data for your own UI. Gating turns a read into access. Start at the Integrate overview.
Everything is on testnet for now. Mainnet is on the roadmap, and reads will carry their full weight once it lands. Until then, treat scores as a testnet signal.

​
Still have a question

Start integrating

The hands-on path.

Reach out

Ask us directly.